ANALISIS FLYPAPER EFFECT PADA DANA ALOKASI UMUM DAN PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH TERHADAP BELANJA DAERAH DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Dwi Pratiwi PUSAT KAJIAN ANGGARAN
  • RASTRI PARAMITHA PUSAT KAJIAN ANGGARAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22212/jbudget.v1i2.97

Keywords:

FlypaperEffect, BalancingFunds, OwnSourceRevenue

Abstract

In 1999, the Government of Indonesia introduced local autonomy to the level of regional governance. It coerces a regional government to be ready to accept more responsibility in governing and managing its house affairs. The main funding sources of local governments come from Own-Source Revenue (PAD). Besides, they also get help from central government transfer such as Balancing Funds (Dana Perimbangan) Which Consist of General Allocation Funds (DAU), Specific Allocation Funds (DAK) And Revenue Sharing Funds (DBH). The regional transfer funds aim to provoke the local government to generate more their own revenue. The regions however become more dependent on central government. Instead of optimizing their own sources income, they tend to enjoy the transfer funds from the central government. There is an indication of asymmetric behavior in response to the transfer of local government. It implies that the regional transfer (i.e. general allocation fund) increases the level of public spending more than an increase in local income of an equivalent size. This study has the objective to provide empirical evidence for the occurrence of flypaper effect on government spending in Indonesia. The study is using a multiple regression as method analysis. This study result indicates that there is flypaper effect on DAU in Indonesia.

References

Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan. 2014. “Laporan Pelaksanaan Spending Performance dalam Mendanai Pelayanan Publik”

Fillimon, R., T. Romer, dan H. Rosenthal. 1982. “Asymmetric )nformation and Agenda Control”.

Journal of Public Economics, 17(2). Februari: 51-70

Gramlich, E.M. 1977. “)ntergovernmental Grants: A Review of the Empirical Literature”, dalam

W.E. Oates, (Ed.). The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Lexington Books. Lexington MA: 219-40

Hines Jr., J.R., dan R.H. Thaler. 1995. “Anomalies: The Flypaper Effect”. Journal of Economic Perspective. 9(4): 217-26.

Kurnia, Eka. 2013. “Analisis Flypaper Effect Berdasarkan Pemetaan )ndeks Kemampuan Keuangan dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi (Studi Kasus Pada Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Timur)”. Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya.

Kesumadewi, Diah Ayu, & Arief Rahman. 2007. “Flypaper effect pada dana alokasi umum (DAU) dan pendapatan asli daerah (PAD) terhadap belanja daerah pada kabupaten/kota di Indonesia”. Yogyakarta. JAAI, vol. 11(1). 67-80.

Logan, R.R. 1986. “Fiscal )llusion and the Grantor Government”. Journal of Political Economy,

(6). November/Desember: 1304-18

McGuire, M.C. 1973. “Notes on Grant-in-Aid and Economic )nteractions among Governments”.

Canadian Journal of Economics, 6(2),.Mei: 207-21

Oates, W.E. 1979. “Lump-Sum )ntergovernmental Grants (ave Prices Effects”, dalam P.M. Mieszkowski dan W.H. Oakland, (Ed.), Fiscal Federalism and Grants-in-Aid. The Urban Institute. Washington, DC: 23-30

Oates, W.E. 1994. “Federalism and Government Finance”, dalam J. Quigley dan E. Smolensky,

(Ed.). Modern Public Finance. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. MA: 126-51

Tiebout, C.M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure”. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5).

Oktober: 416-24

Turnbull, G.K. 1992. “Fiscal )llusion, Uncertainty, And The Flypaper Effect”. Journal of Public

Economics 48 (2), Juli:207-23

UU Nomor 25 Tahun 1999 tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Daerah

UU Nomor 33 Tahun 2004 tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Pemerintahan Daerah

UU Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah

Published

15-12-2016

How to Cite

Pratiwi, D., & PARAMITHA, R. (2016). ANALISIS FLYPAPER EFFECT PADA DANA ALOKASI UMUM DAN PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH TERHADAP BELANJA DAERAH DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Budget : Isu Dan Masalah Keuangan Negara, 1(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.22212/jbudget.v1i2.97