PENGARUH BELANJA PEMERINTAH DAERAH TERHADAP KINERJA PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22212/jbudget.v4i2.80Keywords:
Local government spending, Evaluasi Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah (EKPPD), capital expenditure ratioAbstract
This study examines how local government spending affects public services provided to the public. The performance of public service delivery is measured by the achievement of the performance of local government operations which are the object of evaluation in the Evaluasi Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah (EKPPD) which is carried out annually by the Ministry of Home Affairs. Whereas government expenditure is regional government expenditure per function per capita. Using a sample of 94 local governments, this study took the period 2014 to 2018. The results showed that per capita expenditure function had a positive effect on the performance of local government administration for regional government authority in education, health and infrastructure (housing and public facilities). The capital expenditure ratio is also tested to see the effect of capital expenditure on the performance of public service delivery. In testing the performance of the health and infrastructure sectors, this ratio has a significant negative effect, but for the performance of the education sector this ratio has no significant effect. This means that capital expenditures incurred by local governments have not been effective in meeting the needs of public services for the community, especially in the field of education.
References
Blane D. Lewis. (2016). Local government spending and service delivery in Indonesia: the perverse effects of substantial fiscal resources. Regional Studies, DOI:10.1080/00343404.2016.1216957.
Baldacci, E., Guin-Siu, M., & De Mello, L. (2003). More on the effectiveness of public spending on health care and education: A covariance structure model. Journal of International Development, 15, 709–725. doi:10.1002/jid.1025.
Hanushek, E. (1995). Interpreting recent research on schooling in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 227–246. doi:10.1093/wbro/10.2.227.
Mingat, A., & Tan, J. (1992). Education in Asia: A comparative study of cost and financing. Washington, DC: Education Group, Human Development Department, World Bank.
Mingat, A., & Tan, J. (1998). The mechanics of progress in education: Evidence from cross-country data. Policy Research Working Paper No. 2015. Washington, DC: Education Group, Human Development Department, World Bank.
Or, Z. (2000). Determinants of health outcomes in industrialized countries: A pooled cross-country time series analysis. OECD Economic Studies, 30, 53– 77.
Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). The impact of public spending on health: Does money matter? Social Science and Medicine, 49, 1309–1323. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00150-1.
Filmer, D., Hammer, J., & Pritchett, L. (2000). Weak links in the chain: A diagnosis of health policy in poor countries. World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 199–224. doi:10.1093/wbro/15.2.199.
Gupta, S., Verhoeven, M., & Tiongson, E. (2002). The effectiveness of government spending on education and health care in developing and transition economies. European Journal of Political Economy, 18, 717–737. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00116-7.
Jackson, C., Johnson, R., & Persisco, C. (2015). The effects of school spending on education and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. NBER Working Paper No. 20847. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
Lewis, B. (2014). Twelve years of fiscal decentralisation: A balance sheet. In H. Hill (Ed.), Regional dynamics in a decentralised Indonesia (pp. 135–155). Singapore: Institute of South-East Asia Studies.
Lewis, B. (2015a). Local public financial management performance in Indonesia: Political and fiscal causes and effects (Working Paper). Canberra: Arndt- Corden Department of Economics.
World Bank. (2012). Indonesia subnational public expenditure review: Optimizing subnational performance for better services and faster growth. Jakarta: World Bank.
Patunru, A. A., & Rahman, E. A. (2014). Local governance and development outcomes. In H. Hill (Ed.), Regional dynamics in a decentralised Indonesia (pp. 156–185). Singapore: Institute of South-East Asia Studies.
Rajkumar, A., & Swaroop, V. (2008). Public spending and outcomes: Does governance matter. Journal of Development Economics, 86, 96–111. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.08.003.
Schulze, G. G., & Sjahrir, B. S. (2014). Decentralisation, governance, and public service delivery. In H. Hill (Ed.), Regional dynamics in a decentralised Indonesia (pp. 186–207). Singapore: Institute of South-East Asia Studies.
Haryanto, Joko Tri. (2015). Desentralisasi Fiskal Seutuhnya. Working paper Badan Kebijakan Fiskal, Kementerian Keuangan RI. Diakses dari https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/artikel-dan-opini/desentralisasi-fiskal- seutuhnya.
Jensen, M dan W. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm; Managerial Behaviour, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, p 305-360.
Halim, Abdulah dan Abdullah, Syukriy. (2005). Hubungan dan Masalah Keagenan di Pemerintah Daerah: (Sebuah Peluang Penelitian Anggaran dan Akuntansi). http://kelembagaandas.wordpress.com/teori-agensi-principal- agent-theory/abdulhalim-dan-syukriy-abdullah/:.
Lane, Jan-Erik. (2000). The Public Sector – Concepts, Models and Approaches.
London: SAGE Publications.
Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science 28(5): 739-777.
Setiawan, Wahyu. (2012). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (LKPD) Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Skripsi Sarjana. Semarang. Universitas Diponegoro.
Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Andi. Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 73 Tahun 2009 tentang Tata Cara
Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 3 Tahun 2007 tentang tentang Laporan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah Kepada Pemerintah, Laporan Keterangan Pertanggungjawaban Kepala Daerah kepada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah, dan Informasi Laporan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah kepada Masyarakat. Jakarta. Kementerian Dalam Negeri.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 6 Tahun 2008 tentang Pedoman Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah. Jakarta: Kementerian Dalam Negeri.
Wardhani, R., Rossieta, H. & Martani, D. (2017). Good governance and the impact of government spending on performance of local government in Indonesia. Int. J. Public Sector Performance Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.77–102.
Sudarsana, Hafidh Susila, & Rahardjo, Shiddiq Nur. (2013). Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah Dan Temuan Audit Bpk Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota Di Indonesia). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting Volume 2, Nomor 4, Tahun 2013.
Mustikarini, Widya Astuti dan Fitriasasi, Debby. (2012). Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah dan Temuan Audit BPK Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia Tahun Anggaran 2007. Forum: Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 15, http//www.sna.akuntansi.unikal.ac.id.
Nugroho, Fajar dan Rohman, Abdul. (2012). Pengaruh Belanja Modal Terhadap Pertumbuhan Kinerja Keuangan Daerah Dengan Pendapatan Asli Daerah Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Kasus Di Propinsi Jawa Tengah). Skripsi Sarjana. Semarang. Universitas Diponegoro.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marihot Nasution
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Budget is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://ejurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/jurnalbudget/index.
