ANALISIS PEMANFAATAN DANA BANTUAN SOSIAL DAN HIBAH DI TINGKAT KABUPATEN/KOTA PADA PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH TAHUN 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22212/jbudget.v3i2.71Keywords:
incumbent, non-incumbent, elections, social funds and grantsAbstract
This study examines the use of social assistance funds and grants ahead of the 2018 elections. This test is carried out by examining differences in the allocation of grants and social assistance funds in local governments led by incumbent leaders. The results show that there is a significant difference in the allocation of social assistance funds and grants in the first period of office and then nominate again in the next election. As long as the leaders served in the two leadership periods of 2008-2013 and 2013-2018, the allocation of social expenditure and grants in 2013 and 2017 had an average difference, where in 2013 the expenditure allocation was greater than in 2017. In 2017 was the last year the leader served in government. Differences also appear in the leadership tenure where there is still a chance for him to run for the next election. During his tenure as leader in the 2014-2018 period, the allocation of social assistance and grants in 2016 had an average allocation of social assistance funds and grants of 2.4 percent which had a statistically significant difference in 2017 (ahead of the 2018 election) where the funds were flat allocated by 3.4 percent. The allocation difference is also caused by the influence of the fiscal space of the regional government. However, from the results of linear regression, it was found that the amount of social assistance allocations and grants was not influenced by political factors such as the presence of incumbent leaders in government.
References
Abdullah, S. dan J. A. Asmara. 2006. Perilaku Oportunistik Legislatif dalam Penganggaran Daerah: Bukti Empiris atas Aplikasi Agency Theory di Sektor Publik. Paper dipresentasikan pada acara Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) IX, Padang.
Alt, James E.; Dreyer Lassen, David (2005) : The Political Budget Cycle is Where You Can't See It: Transparency and Fiscal Manipulation, EPRU Working Paper Series, No. 2005-03, University of Copenhagen, Economic Policy Research Unit (EPRU), Copenhagen.
Clémence Vergne. Democracy, Elections and Allocation of Public Expenditure in Developing Countries. 2006.08. 2011.
Direktur Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan. 2018. Data Realisasi Anggaran Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2013-2017.
Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan. 2014. Analisis APBD Tahun 2014. Diunduh tanggal 5 April 2015, http://www.djpk.depkeu.go.id/ebook/buku/book/28-buku-diskripsi-dan- analisis-apbd-2014/2-buku .
Eftriani, Z. 2014. Proses Perumusan Anggaran Belanja Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial APBD Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Garamfalvi, L. 2003. Corruption in the Public Expenditures Management Process. Paper presented at the International Anti Corruption Conference (IACC), Lima, Peru.
Gupta, S., H. Davoodi, and E. Tiongson. 2000. Corruption and the Provision of Health Care and Education Services. Working Paper, International Monetary Fund.
Hadiz, V. R. 2010. Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hessami, Z. 2014. Political Corruption, Public Procurement, and Budget Composition: Theory and Evidence from OECD Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 372-389.
Keefer, P. and S. Khemani. 2003. Democracy, Public Expenditures and the Poor.
Working Paper, The World Bank.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. 2014. Cegah Penyalahgunaan Hibah Bansos. Diunduh tanggal 16 Februari 2015, http://kpk.go.id/id/berita/siaran-pers/1657- cegah-dana-bansos-dan-hibah-dari-penyalahgunaan.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri. 2018. Daftar Nama Gubernur Dan Wakil Gubernur Seluruh Indonesia.
Mauro, P. 1998. Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure.Journal of Public Economics, 69, 263-279.
Mardiasmo. 2009. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Mietzner, M. 2010. Indonesia’s Direct Elections: Empowering the Electorate or Entrenching the New Order Oligarchy? In: E. Aspinall and G. Fealy (eds.),Soeharto’s New Order and Its Legacy, 173-190. Canberra: ANU ePress.
Mietzner, M. 2011. Funding Pilkada: Illegal Campaign Financing in Indonesia’s Local Elections. In: E. Aspinall and G. van Klinken (eds.), The State and Illegality in Indonesia, 123-138. Leiden: KITLV Press.
Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara. Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. 2011. Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. 2011. Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 32 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Pemberian Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial yang Bersumber dari Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah. Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. 2012. Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 39 Tahun 2012 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 32 Tahun 2011 tentang Pedoman Pemberian Hibah dan Bantuan Sosial yang Bersumber dari Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah. Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. 2014. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. 2015. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati dan Walikota menjadi Undang- Undang. Jakarta: Pemerintah Indonesia.
Ritonga, I. T. dan M. I. Alam. 2010. Apakah Incumbent Memanfaatkan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD) untuk Mencalonkan Kembali dalam Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah (Pilkada). Paper dipresentasikan pada acara Simposium Nasional Akuntansi (SNA) XIII, Purwokerto.
Rubin, I. S. 1993. The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing 2nd. Chatam, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.
Schick, A. 2008. Budgeting for Fiscal Space. Paper presented at the Asian OEDC Senior Budget Officials Meeting, Bangkok.
Sjahrir, B. S., K. Kis-Katos, and G. G. Schulze. 2013. Political Budget Cycles in Indonesia at the District Level. Economic Letters, 120 (2), 342-345.
Shi, Min and Jakob Svensson. 2002a. “Conditional Political Business Cycles,” CEPR Discussion Paper #3352.
Supriyanto, Y. 2015. Pengaruh Ruang Fiskal dan Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah dan Indikasi Korupsi (Studi Kasus pada Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia Tahun 2010-2012). Tesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Tanzi, V. and Davoodi, H. 2003. Corruption, Public Investment and Growth.
Working Paper, International Monetary Fund.
Vijayakumar, J. 1995. An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Influencing Call Decisions of Local Governments Bonds. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14 (3), 203-231.
Winoto, Agus Hadi dan Falikhatun. 2015. Indikasi Penyalahgunaan Discretionary Fund Dalam Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah Menjelang Pilkada 2015. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia Volume 12 Nomor 1, Juni 2015
Indonesian Corruption Watch. 2018. Outlook Korupsi Politik 2018: Ancaman Korupsi di Balik Pemilu 2018 dan 2019. Kajian ICW
Indonesian Corruption Watch. 2018. Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2017.
Kajian ICW
Kompas.com. 2010. Pilkada Rawan Korupsi. Diakses dari https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2010/01/08/06472666/Pilkada.Rawan.Kor upsi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Dwi Resti Pratiwi, Marihot Nasution
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Budget is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://ejurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/jurnalbudget/index.
